czwartek, 20 września 2012
#224E: When the life is at stake it is good to know ways in which other religions are praying (po polsku ponizej)
Motto: "Wherever there is a life, there is also a hope."
Many people sucked into a whirl of present life, still healthy, and chasing increasingly larger collections of money, cars, electronics, partners, etc., with which they try to match Johnsons, do NOT find time nor motivation to read posts like this one, nor have a habit to listen and to obey the voice of their conscience. The awaking arrives to them only when the time of accountability comes and thus when they look death straight into eyes. This is because if God still does NOT consider them to be completely lost cases, then He does NOT kill them instantly, but still gives them a bit of time for acting, for improvement, for saying good bye to life and to world, etc. Thus, they may learn then e.g. that they have some nasty kind of cancer, that the illness which overtook them has a significant chance to be terminal, that the boat in which they are travelling is just sinking, etc., etc. Is it too late to begin a defence in such situation? It turns out that NO - according to the Bible never is too late for a defence. Only that one needs to know what to do in such cases and how to defend oneself. The key to our defence then is the right kind of "prayer".
For most people, however, the problem is that they do NOT know how to pray for the survival or for being saved from a cataclysm. For example, the most common error in such prayers to God is to just ask for our rescue - which mistake I will explain in the next paragraph of this section. Also, if someone already offers something to God in return for the healing or survival, than it tend to be just own money, NOT a personal action. However God needs our actions completed in person, NOT our gifts of money. After all, for God to cause that someone in a need gets our money, does NOT require that we remain alive. This is because someone else can also give our money to people in need, e.g. money can give our heir inspired by the divine promptings. In turn our action completed in person become possible only in cases if God keeps us alive. Other common mistake in prayers for the rescue is that if someone actually offers to God some their work completed in person, then the typical offer is to carry out an unskilled labour, for example as a nurse, cleaner, cook, etc. But God has many donors of unskilled labour. However, in His service is the lack of people whose work requires high knowledge, experience, education, etc. After all, people with high knowledge and skills typically are "atheists" which almost NEVER offer to God their expensive skills in service for the good of other people. Thus, the more qualified and skilled is a kind of personal work that one offers to God in prayers as an exchange for recovery or for saving, and the less people exist who can do this particular work for God, the greater chance that God will accept such an offer. Another common mistake of such prayers to God is to offer the work of other people who are employees of the person who prays, that is, to offer the work of subordinates, workers, or the family of the person in trouble. Yet for God, each person is responsible only for his or her own actions. Thus work of other people (than the praying person) is a matter between God and these other people. Summing up, it is good when long time before the "death looks into our eyes", we already consider what kind of work done by us in person for the good of humanity we will be able to offer to God in exchange for our recovery or rescue. The early identifying of a highly attractive such a work may save our lives, and the immediate implementation of this work can cause that God may save us even from experiencing a situation when we will be forced to either offer to God our work, or to die prematurely.
In the cases discussed here, when the "death looks us straight into our eyes", there are numerous levels our defence which we then should take. The first and the most important level of our defence, is to convince God with our fast and sincere prayer, that we ourselves deeply believe that from the prospective of His superior goals and intentions, it will be more beneficial when God keeps us alive than when He allows us to die. Although almost every person which looks death straight into eyes, rapidly remembers God and starts to pray hard (according to an old Polish saying that "when in trouble then to God" - in the original Polish language "kiedy trwoga to do Boga"), but the majority of such people typically do NOT know how to pray in such circumstances and how to present to God their request to keep them alive. Typically the majority of people in such situations only ask God in their prayers e.g. "keep me alive, because I am afraid to die and I still wish to live slightly longer". But from the point of view of goals and intentions of God such a request does NOT contain anything that would make their lives worth extending. Therefore, the most vital component of prayers in such situations is to include into them a kind of agreement or a promise addressed to God. After all, just such agreements or promises are included into most vital prayers of religious practitioners from the Far East (e.g. from Hinduism or Taoism - consider the essence of their rituals called "Thaipusam" or "Nine Gods", photographs from which are shown as "Fig. #B1" from the web page "god.htm" and "Fig. #E3" from the web page "soul_proof.htm"). Also such way of praying during centuries of their interactions with God turned out to be the most effective. Namely, in our praying we should include e.g. a promise, that if God allows us to survive a given situation and saves our life, then the entire rest of living which God gives to us, we are going to designate to a specific kind of service to God through devoting our work for morality and for good of other people. Of course, in our prayers we should NOT use general statements of the kind, that "we will help other people", but we must present to God a specific activities which we are going to carry out as our form of "serving God for the good of other people". After all, depending on how attractive for goals and intentions of God turn out these specific proposals that we are to declare, it will determine whether God is going to grant a survival for us. Thus we should promise God that if we come out alive from a given situation, then specifically either e.g. we begin to help voluntarily and free of charge in the local orphanage, hospice, asylum, poorhouse, etc.; or that e.g. so many times a week we will provide cooked meals to specific people who need these (e.g. some known to us older or ill people); or that e.g. we will openly promote the moral lives according to principles of the philosophy of totalizm (we should in such case define specifically how we will implement this promotion - e.g. whether we will establish for this appropriate web pages, or write suitable articles to newspaper or periodicals, write and publish a book, etc.); or that e.g. we will openly support in some specific institutions, gatherings, or forums ideas and principles established by the "totaliztic science"; etc.; etc. Of course, I do NOT need to explain here, that if we offer God such a promise and we really get healthy or survive, then it would be a kind of "spiritual suicide" to abandon later the implementation of that promise to the letter. We also must NOT begin to doubt "where really our survival comes from" only because it will NOT display spectacular attributes of a miracle. (After all, almost everything that God does must fulfil the "canon of ambiguity" described in item #C2 of the web page "will.htm", while is implemented by God according to principles explained, amongst others, in item #C2 of page "tornado.htm".)
Money (funds) can be of a problem in the fulfilment of our promise. But God Will NOT consider then what excuse we have to fail doing what we promised, and He is only to judge whether we completed the promise, or NOT. Therefore, if any of our action requires funds which we do NOT have, then we should NOT offer it in our prayers (after all, offering something that is impossible for completing by us, would reveal to God the lack of realism in our promises). If we offer something that requires funds, we must be prepared that the cost of the completion of it is to be covered from our own pocket. Similarly, we should NOT pay other people so that they do for us the work that we promised to do ourselves. If we have the required funds, then we should undertake ourselves the implementation of an appropriately large project, in which our funds are to pay the cost of materials and the cost of additional partners and sub-contractors, but in which we ourselves will do the most important work for this project.
The further emphasizing of our request in such an important prayer to God, we can accomplish if we have a moral basis to state, that it is our first request for a favour to ourselves with which we come up since a long time. This is because, although we should regularly pray to God, typically - if we are NOT just in a really critical situation, we should altruistically ask God for something for the good of other people rather than for ourselves. The point is that if someone poured a constant stream of requests to God asking for something to himself, then for example in the case of real life and death situation, his prayer and request becomes just another request from a long list of his ongoing requests. In such a situation, the value of this request would NOT be of the same weight as it would be if it was the first personal request for a favour sent to God since a long time.
The second level of our defence, is a mental defence. This is because we must NOT give up mentally, but until the very end we must maintain an optimism and the belief in our survival. After all, "wherever is a life, there is still a hope". Thus, in every situation when death glances us straight into eyes, we should mobilise ourselves to a deep believe, that at the last moment God still is to arrange for us some kind of a miracle, which is to save us and thus that we are to come out alive from even the most tragic situation. This is because as the philosophy of totalizm has established and explained this to us in item #A2.2 of the web page named "totalizm.htm", "in whatever we believe enough deeply to be motivated by it to vigorous actions, exactly the same God is going to serve to us".
The third level of our defence, is to physically never give up, but to fight for the survival until the very end. After all, God's intention is the upbringing of people through battle-hardening during numerous fights against difficulties of fate - as excellently reminds this to us the proverb that "God helps these people who help themselves". Therefore, in order to prove to God, how much we want to come out alive from a given situation, we should almost simultaneously undertake all actions which are NOT mutually contradictive and which give to us even a smallest chance of coming out alive. For example, if we are ill (e.g. with a cancer), we should NOT rely on just a single method of healing, but we should undertake simultaneously all methods which do NOT stand in a mutual collision - means we should NOT only undertake a conventional operation and chemotherapy in a hospital, but also we should use an anti-cancer diet, some alternative healing method (if we know such a method - e.g. by drinking the juice from "Sabah Snake Grass" described in item #F6 of the web page named "healing.htm"), prayers, and if we can then even we should make a pilgrimage to a place famous from miraculous healings.
We also should NOT be ashamed of our fight for life and for survival. This is because the life is a greatest gift that God gave to us. In turn by fighting for our life (or for the life of anyone else) we demonstrate to God that we appreciate and highly respect this gift. It is because of the respect to this highest gift, that the philosophy of totalizm teaches, that "we should support only these ideas and these people, who ask us to live for them, while we must NOT support anything that requires we die for it".
Of course, NOT every person deserves to receive a "second chance" from God. However, we do NOT need to look far to discover body of evidence which confirms that praying often helps even in seemingly hopeless situations. Thus, for many people the principle of formulating of their prayers described here may prove to be effective. Therefore, in the critical situations, it is worth to resort to it. After all, when the death looks us straight into our eyes, the only other option that is to remain, is to give up and to die.
* * *
The above post is an adaptation of item #G7 from the totaliztic web page named "will.htm" (in the English language) - updated on 25 August 2012, or later. Thus, reading of the above descriptions would be even more effective from that web page, than from this post - after all e.g. on the totaliztic web pages are working all (green) links to other related web pages with additional explanations, texts are printed in colours, the content is supported with illustrations, the content is updated regularly, etc. The most recent update of the web page "will.htm" can be viewed, amongst others, at addresses:
http://soul.frihost.org/will.htm or alias: http://naj.zs.pl - which always links to the most recently updated amongst totaliztic web pages)
Notice that every address with totaliztic web pages, including the above web sites, should contain all totaliztic web pages - including web pages indicated in this post. Thus, in order to see any totaliztic web page that interests us, it suffices that in one amongst the above addresses the web page name "will.htm" is changed into the name of page which the reader wishes to see. For example, in order to see the web page named "tornado.htm" e.g. from the totaliztic web site with the address http://energia.sl.pl/will.htm , it is enough that instead of this address in the window of an internet explorer the reader writes e.g. the address http://energia.sl.pl/tornado.htm .
Also notice that a complete list of (and links to) totaliztic topics discussed in various internet forums is provided in item #E2 of the web page named "faq.htm" - also available at every address listed above.
It is worth to know as well, that almost each new topic that I am researching with "a priori" approach of the new "totaliztic science", including this one, is repeated in all mirror blogs of totalizm still in existence (the above topic is repeated in there as the post number #224E). In past there were 5 such blogs. At the moment only two other blogs of totalizm still remain undeleted by adversaries of the new "totaliztic science" and the moral philosophy of totalizm. These can be viewed at following internet addresses:
http://totalizm.wordpress.com (or alias: http://blog.zs.pl )
With the totaliztic salute,
poniedziałek, 10 września 2012
#224: Gdy chodzi o zycie dobrze poznac jak najefektywniej sie modla w innych religiach
Motto: "Tam gdzie ciagle tli sie zycie, tam tez ciagle istnieje nadzieja."
Wielu ludzi powciaganych w wir dzisiejszego zycia, ciagle zdrowych i uganiajacych sie za gromadzeniem coraz wiekszej kolekcji pieniedzy, samochodów, elektroniki, partnerów, itp., którymi chce dorównywac swemu idolowi, NIE znajduje czasu ani motywacji aby czytac opracowania takie jak niniejsze, ani NIE ma nawyku aby sluchac i wypelniac podszepty swego sumienia. Opamietanie przychodzi do nich dopiero kiedy nadejdzie czas rozliczenia i spojrza smierci prosto w oczy. Jesli bowiem Bóg NIE uwaza ich za calkiem stracony przypadek, wówczas wcale NIE usmierca ich blyskawicznie, a ciagle daje im nieco czasu na dzialanie, na poprawe, na pozegnanie sie z zyciem i swiatem, itp. Dowiaduja sie wówczas, ze np. maja jakas zlosliwa odmiane raka, ze choroba jaka ich dopadla ma wysokie szance aby zakonczyc sie smiercia, ze statek jakim sie wybrali wlasnie tonie, itd., itp. Czy w takiej sytuacji jest juz zbyt pózno aby zaczeli sie bronic? Okazuje sie ze NIE - zgodnie z Biblia nigdy NIE jest zbyt pózno na opamietanie i na obrone. Tyle, ze trzeba wiedziec co wówczas czynic i jak sie bronic. A kluczem do naszej obrony jest wówczas odpowiednia "modlitwa".
Dla wiekszosci ludzi problem polega jednak na tym, ze NIE wiedza jak maja sie modlic o przezycie lub o wyzdrowienie. Przykladowo, jeden z najpopularniejszych bledów polega na tym, ze modlacy sie jedynie prosi Boga o swe uratowanie - co wyjasnie dokladniej w nastepnym paragrafie. Ponadto, jesli ktos zaoferuje juz Bogu cos w zamian za swe wyzdrownienie lub przezycie, zwykle sa to tylko pieniadze, a NIE osobiste dzialania. Tymczasem Bogu sa potrzebne nasze osobiste dzialania, a NIE dotacje naszych pieniedzy. Wszakze w pozycji Boga spowodowanie aby ktos otrzymal nasze pieniadze wcale NIE wymaga abysmy pozostali przy zyciu. Pieniadze te moga wszakze dac temu komus np. nasi spadkobiercy zainspirowani boskimi podszeptami. Natomiast nasze osobiste dzialania staja sie mozliwe tylko jesli Bóg utrzyma nas przy zyciu. Inny czesty blad modlitwy o uratowanie polega na tym, ze jesli ktos zaoferuje juz Bogu jakies swe osobiste dzialania w zamian za swe wyzdrowienie lub przezycie, wówczas typowo oferuje swoja niewykwalifikowana robocizne, jako pielegniarz, sprzatacz, kucharz, itp. Tymczasem Bóg ma wielu dawców niewykwalifikowanej robocizny. Natomiast w jego sluzbie brak jest ludzi których praca wymaga nieprzecietnej wiedzy, doswiadczenia, wyksztalcenia, itp. Wszakze ludzie z duza wiedza i kwalifikacjami to typowo "ateisci" którzy nigdy NIE oferuja swoich kosztownych umiejetnosci Bogu w sluzbie dla dobra innych ludzi. Dlatego im bardziej wykwalifikowany jest rodzaj osobistej pracy jaka w swych modlitwach zaoferujemy Bogu w zamian za wyzdrowienie czy za uratowanie, tym wieksza szansa, ze Bóg zaakceptuje nasza oferte. Jeszcze inny czesty blad takich modlitw polega na oferowaniu Bogu pracy ludzi którzy podlegaja danemu modlacemu sie, tj., pracy podwladnych, robotników, lub rodziny danego modlacego sie. Tymczasem dla Boga, kazdy odpowiada tylko za swoje wlasne czyny. Praca wiec innych (niz modlacy sie) ludzi jest juz sprawa pomiedzy Bogiem i tymi innymi ludzmi. Podsumowujac powyzsze, juz na dlugo wczesniej zanim "smierc zagladnie nam w oczy", warto sie zastanowic jakie osobiste dzialania dla dobra ludzkosci bedziemy wówczas mogli zaoferowac Bogu w zamian za nasze wyzdrowienie lub uratowanie. Wczesniejsze wymyslenie bowiem wysoce atrakcyjnych dzialan moze uratowac nam zycie, zas natychmiastowe wprowadzenie ich w zycie moze spowodowac ze Bóg zaoszczedzi nam nawet sytuacji w których bedziemy zmuszeni aby albo zaoferowac Bogu swoje dzialania, albo tez umrzec przedwczesnie.
W omawianych tutaj sytuacjach, gdy "smierc zaglada nam juz w oczy", istnieje az kilka poziomów naszej obrony która powinnismy wówczas podjac. Pierwszy i najwazniejszy poziom takiej obrony, to przekonanie Boga swa szybka, goraca i szczera modlitwa, ze my sami gleboko wierszymy iz z perspektywy Jego nadrzednych boskich celów i zamiarów, bedzie znacznie korzystniejszym aby Bóg zachowal nas przy zyciu niz aby pozwolil nam umrzec. Chociaz bowiem niemal kazdy kto patrzy smierci prosto w oczy, nagle przypomina sobie Boga i zaczyna goraco sie modlic (zgodnie ze staropolskim powiedzeniem "kiedy trwoga to do Boga"), jednak ogromna wiekszosc owych ludzi typowo NIE wie jak sie modlic w takich okolicznosciach i jak zaprezentowac Bogu swoja prosbe o przezycie. Typowo wiekszosc z ludzi w takich sytuacjach jedynie blaga Boga w swych modlitwach np. "zachowaj mnie przy zyciu, bowiem ja sie boje umierac i ciagle chce pozyc nieco dluzej". Jednak z punktu widzenia celów i intencji Boga taka prosba NIE zawiera w sobie elementów które czynilyby ich zycie wartym przedluzenia. Dlatego najwazniejszym elementem modlitw z takich sytuacji jest zawarcie w nich rodzaju umowy czy obietnicy adresowanej do Boga, ze w zamian za wyzdrowienie lub za uratowanie nam zycia wykonamy potem osobiscie jakies dzialania nazwane konkretnie w naszej modlitwie. Wszakze takie wlasnie umowy czy obietnice juz od wieków sa wprowadzane do najwazniejszych modlitw wyznawców religii Dalekiego Wschodu (np. hinduizmu czy taoizmu - rozwaz powody i esencje organizowanych przez nich rytualów zwanych "Thaipusam" czy "Dziewieciu Bogów", fotografie z których pokazane zostaly jako "Fot. #B1" ze strony "god_pl.htm" oraz "Fot. #E3" ze strony "soul_proof_pl.htm"). Takie tez modlenie okazalo sie tam najbardziej skuteczne w toku wielowiekowych doswiadczen. (A trzeba tu pamietac, ze "chociaz istnieje wiele religii, jest tylko jeden Bóg" - aczkolwiek wiec madry Bóg ustanowil na Ziemi wiele religii których sformulowania sa celowo tak opracowane aby mozliwie najlepiej sluzyc ludziom danej rasy i konkretnego obszaru Ziemi, jednak wszystkie te religie modla sie do jednego i do tego samego Boga.) Mianowicie, w swych modlitwach trzeba np. obiecac, ze jesli Bóg pozwoli nam wyjsc zywcem z naszego zagrozenia i uratuje nam zycie, wówczas cala reszte tego zycia jaka Bóg nam da, my przeznaczymy na konkretny rodzaj sluzenia Bogu poprzez oddawanie naszej pracy dla moralnosci i dla dobra innych ludzi. Oczywiscie, Bóg zna nas doskonale i zna przyszlosc. Dlatego w swych modlitwach NIE powinnismy uzywac generalnych sformulowan w rodzaju, ze "bedziemy pomagali innym ludziom", a nalezy Bogu zaprezentowac jakies konkretne i osobiste dzialania które my osobiscie podejmiemy w ramach owej naszej "sluzby Bogu dla dobra innych ludzi". Wszakze od tego jak korzystne dla celów i intencji Boga okaza sie owe konkretne nasze propozycje, bedzie zalezalo czy Bóg udzieli nam wyzdrowinie lub przedluzenie zycia. Stad powinnismy Bogu konkretnie obiecac, ze jesli wyjdziemy calo z danej sytuacji, wówczas albo np. zaczniemy dopomagac ochotniczo w jakims pobliskim i znanym nam przytulku, sierocincu czy domu dziecka, albo ze np. tyle to a tyle razy w tygodniu podejmiemy dostarczanie gotowanych obiadów jakims konkretnie znanym nam osobom które ich potrzebuja (np. jakims znanym nam chorym lub starym osobom), albo ze np. bedziemy otwarcie propagowali moralne zycie zgodne z zasadami filozofii totalizmu (powinnismy przy tym konkretnie zdefiniowac jak bedziemy realizowali to propagowanie - np. czy zalozymy w tym celu odpowiednie strony internetowe, napiszemy artykuly do gazet lub periodyków, napiszemy i wydamy ksiazke, itp.), albo ze np. bedziemy otwarcie popierali w jakichs konkretnych instytucjach, zgromadzeniach, czy forach idee i zasady gloszone przez "totaliztyczna nauke", albo ze pelniac pozycje odpowiedzialnosci zwrócimy uwage na zasady opisane w punkcie #L3 strony "cielcza.htm", itd., itp. Oczywiscie, NIE musze tutaj wyjasniac, ze jesli zlozymy Bogu tego typu obietnice i faktycznie wyzdrowiejemy albo wyjdziemy z zyciem, wówczas byloby rodzajem "duchowego samobójstwa" zaniechanie pózniejszego zrealizowania tej obietnicy co do litery. NIE wolno tez nam potem zaczac watpic "skad naprawde wzielo sie nasze przezycie" tylko poniewaz NIE bedzie to wykazywalo spektakularnych cech cudu. (Wszakze niemal wszystko co Bóg czyni musi spelniac "kanon niejednoznacznosci" opisany w punkcie #C2 strony "will_pl.htm", zas realizowany wedlug zasad wyjasnionych m.in. w punkcie #C2 strony "tornado_pl.htm".)
Pieniadze (fundusze) moga byc problemem w wypelnieniu naszej obietnicy. Bóg zas NIE bedzie potem rozwazal jaka wymówke bedziemy mieli aby NIE wywiazac sie z tego co obiecalismy, a jedynie osadzi czy wywiazalismy sie z obietnicy, czy tez NIE. Dlatego jesli jakies nasze dzialanie wymaga funduszy których NIE posiadamy, wówczas NIE powinnismy go oferowac w swoich modlitwach (wszakze czegos dla nas niewykonalnego ujawnialoby Bogu brak realizmu w naszych obietnicach). Jesli zas cos juz oferujemy co wymaga funduszy, musimy byc przygotowani ze koszta tego czegos pokryjemy potem z naszej wlasnej kieszeni. Podobnie NIE wolno nam oplacac innych ludzi aby to oni wykonali za nas nasza prace. Jesli bowiem mamy wymagane fundusze, wówczas powinnismy my sami podjac osobista realizacje jakiegos odpowiednio duzego projetu, w którym nasze fundusze beda oplacaly koszta materialowe i koszta dodatkowych kooperantów, jednak w którym to my sami i osobiscie wykonamy najwazniejsza dla tego projektu prace.
Dodatkowe zaakcentowanie naszej prosby w tak istotnej modlitwie do Boga mozna uzyskac, jesli ma sie moralne podstawy aby uwypulic, ze jest to nasza pierwsza prosba o cos dla nas samych, z jaka wychodzimy od dluzszego juz czasu. Typowo bowiem - jesli wlasnie NIE znajdujemy sie w jakiejs naprawde krytycznej sytuacji, wprawdzie powinnismy systematycznie modlic sie do Boga, jednak kiedy nasze modlitwy sa proszacego rodzaju, wówczas zazwyczaj powinny one altruistycznie prosic Boga o cos dla innych ludzi raczej niz dla nas samych. Chodzi bowiem o to, ze jesli ktos zalewa Boga nieustannym potokiem prósb o cos dla siebie, wówczas np. w sytuacji zycia i smierci jego prosba staje sie tylko kolejna prosba z owego dlugiego potoku jego nieustajacych prósb. W takiej zas sytaucji wartosc tej prosby NIE ma juz tej samej wagi jaka by posiadala gdyby byla pierwsza prosba o cos dla siebie skladana od dlugiego juz czasu.
Drugi poziom obrony, to obrona mentalna. NIE wolno bowiem mentalnie dawac za wygrana, a az do samego konca trzeba zachowywac optymizm i wiare w przetrwanie. Trzeba tez dzialac optymistycznie. Wszakze "tam gdzie ciagle tli sie zycie, ciagle istnieje tez nadzieja". W kazdej wiec sytuacji kiedy smierc zaglada nam w oczy trzeba sie zmobilizowac do glebokiej wiary, iz w ostatniej chwili Bóg ciagle zorganizuje dla nas jakis cud który nas uratuje i ze wyjdziemy z zyciem nawet z najbardziej tragicznej sytuacji. Jak bowiem filozofia totalizmu to ustalila i wyjasnia nam w punkcie #A2.2 strony o nazwie "totalizm_pl.htm", w cokolwiek wierzymy na tyle gleboko, ze motywuje nas to do odnotowywalnego dzialania, dokladnie to Bóg nam zaserwuje.
Trzeci poziom obrony, to fizycznie NIE dawac za wygrana, a walczyc o przezycie az do samego konca. Wszakze Bóg chce wychowac sobie ludzi na wytrwalych w walce z przeciwnosciami losu - co doskonale oddaje staropolskie przyslowie, ze "Bóg pomaga tym co pomagaja sobie sami". Dlatego aby udowodnic Bogu, jak bardzo chcemy wyjsc calo z owej sytuacji, powinnismy niemal równoczesnie podejmowac wszelkie dzialania jakie NIE sa wzajemnie sprzeczne i jakie daja nam chocby najniklejsza szanse ujscia z zyciem. Przykladowo, jesli jestesmy chorzy (np. na raka), NIE powinnismy polegac tylko na jednej metodzie leczenia, a równoczesnie podjemowac wszystkie metody jakie NIE stoja we wzajemnej kolizji - znaczy NIE tylko podejmowac konwencjonalna operacje i chemoterapie w szpitalu, ale takze stosowac antyrakowa diete, jakies alternatywne leczenie (jesli takie znamy - np. zjadanie "wezowej trawy z Sabah" opisane w punkcie #F6 na stronie "healing_pl.htm"), modlitwe, a jesli mozemy to nawet i odbyc pielgrzymke do jakiegos miejsca slynnego z cudownych uzdrowien.
Nie powinnismy tez wstydzic sie swojej walki o zycie i o przetrwanie. zycie bowiem jest najwyzszym dobrem jakie Bóg nam dal. Walczac o swe zycie demonstrujemy tez Bogu iz doceniamy i wysoce szanujemy owo dobro. To wlasnie z szacunku dla tego najwyzszego dobra, filozofia totalizmu naucza, ze "popierac nalezy tylko te idee i te osoby, które nam nakazuja aby dla nich zyc, zas NIE wolno nam popierac niczego co wymaga aby dla tego umierac".
Oczywiscie, NIE kazda osoba zasluzyla sobie na otrzymanie od Boga "drugiej szansy". Jednak NIE trzeba tez daleko szukac aby odkryc material dowodowy który potwierdza, ze modlenie sie czesto pomaga nawet w sytuacjach zdawaloby sie beznadziejnych. Dla wielu wiec osób opisana tu zasada formulowania swej modlitwy moze jednak okazac sie efektywna. Dlatego w krytycznej sytuacji warto do niej sie odwolac. Wszakze kiedy smierc zagladnie nam juz w oczy, jedyna inna opcja jaka nam pozostanie, to dac za wygrana i umrzec.
* * *
Powyzszy wpis stanowi adaptacje punktu #G7 z totaliztycznej strony o nazwie "will_pl.htm" (aktualizacja z 25 sierpnia 2012 roku, lub pozniej). Stad czytanie powyzszych opisow byloby nawet bardziej efektywne z tamtej strony internetowej "will_pl.htm", niz z niniejszego wpisu - wszakze na owej stronie dzialaja wszystkie (zielone) linki do pokrewnych stron z dodatkowymi informacjami, tekst zawiera polskie literki, uzyte sa kolory i ilustracje, zawartosc jest powtarzalnie aktualizowana, itp. Najnowsza aktualizacja strony "will_pl.htm" juz zostala zaladowana i udostepniona wszystkim chetnym m.in. pod nastepujacymi adresami (przegladajac te adresy warto zwrocic uwage jak rozlegle, silnie i zawziecie tzw. "przeklenstwo wynalazców" dziala wobec stron internetowych prezentujacych ustalenia nowej "totaliztycznej nauki"):
http://soul.frihost.org/will_pl.htm lub alias: http://naj.zs.pl (który zawsze linkuje do najnowszej z aktualizowanych stron)
Kazdy adres z totaliztycznymi stronami - w tym równiez kazdy z powyzszych adresów, powinien zawierac wszystkie totaliztyczne strony, wlaczajac w to strony których nazwy sa wskazywane w niniejszym wpisie. Stad aby wywolac dowolna interesujaca nas totaliztyczna strone, trzeba np. w jednym z powyzszych adresów nazwe strony "will_pl.htm" zastapic nazwa strony która chce sie wywolac. Przykladowo, aby wywolac sobie strone o nazwie "healing_pl.htm" np. z witryny o adresie http://energia.sl.pl/will_pl.htm , wystarczy aby zamiast owego adresu wpisac w okienku adresowym wyszukiwarki tak zmodyfikowany adres http://energia.sl.pl/healing_pl.htm .
Zauwaz takze, ze pelny wykaz (oraz linki) do totaliztycznych tematów dyskutowanych na najrózniejszych forach internetowych, jest podany w punkcie #E2 strony o nazwie "faq_pl.htm" - równiez dostepnej pod kazdym z adresów wyszczególnionych powyzej.
Warto tez wiedziec, ze niemal kazdy nowy temat jaki juz przebadalem dla podejscia "a priori" nowej "totaliztycznej nauki" i/lub przedyskutowalem na forach internetowych, w tym i niniejszy temat, jest potem powtarzany na wszystkich lustrzanych blogach totalizmu które ciagle istnieja (powyzsza tresc jest tam prezentowana we wpisie numer #223). Kiedys istnialo az 5 takich blogow. Dwa ostatnie blogi totalizmu, jakie ciagle nie zostaly polikwidowane przez przeciwników "totaliztycznej nauki" i przeciwników wysoce moralnej "filozofii totalizmu", mozna znalezc pod nastepujacymi adresami:
http://totalizm.wordpress.com lub alias: http://blog.zs.pl
Z totaliztycznym salutem,
sobota, 01 września 2012
#223E: How the definition of the term "science" causes corruption and distortions of this institution (po polsku ponizej)
Motto: "Human imperfections are so powerful, that if they are unleashed from control and supervision, then over time they are able to corrupt completely even the most noble institution."
The most serious problems with today's official "science" are stemming from the fact, that this science deliberately defines itself in a way that deceives people. For example, the typical definition of "science", which can be found e.g. in textbooks, dictionaries, and in today's search engines, says roughly the following: "science is a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws".
Unfortunately, both - the above definition, as well as all other official definitions of the term "science" previously disseminated by the same "science", demonstrate a high primitiveness, obsolescence, and in addition also errors. As such, they deliberately mislead people - means they actually "lie". Therefore, the term "science" needs to be redefined (or "reformed") today in the same way as Karl Marx once redefined ("reformed") the term "capital" - thus opening the eyes of people to the imperfections of the capitalist societies and political systems. Similarly as in past the redefining (or "reforming") the term "capital" caused revolutions and speed-up the process of improving the lives of many people, let us hope that the today's redefinition of the term "science" will also improve and simplify access of people to the so-called "truth". The main shortcomings of the above sample definition, as well as all other official definitions of the term "science" disseminated so-far by the science itself, are as follows:
1. This definition does not reveal that the "orthodox science" to-date really is "an exploiting institution living from taxes of citizens", which in order to achieve its selfish goals in an easiest way, forces onto the people and now jealously guards, its absolute "monopoly for knowledge and for the formation of human views". The fact of keeping secret in official definitions, that the science is the "monopolistic institution living from exploitation of taxpayers", which institution, to gain its monopoly, deliberately and systematically destroyed the other similar institution called "religion", hides from the sight of taxpayers a whole range of adverse effects arising from this secrecy. For example, it hides from the sight of taxpayers that the science only pretends to "promote progress", but actually it focuses itself only on the multiplying its own benefits, on caring for its own selfish interests, and on meeting its own needs (instead of meeting the needs of humanity - from taxes of which it is maintained). Furthermore, as a monopolistic institution it actually is NOT interested in ascertaining the truth, in bearing the responsibility for its own claims, nor in correcting its own distortions. Thus, the "truth" it tells only when it is forced to it. It is just for such reasons that nearly everything that the official science claims today, after some time will be announced to be untrue and replaced with some other its lies.
2. This definition does NOT emphasize the fact that the whole "science" and all the "scientists" do NOT generate any physical product, thus regardless of where comes from and how is called the funding for their existence, this funding is always a form of "tax". In turn by being paid from "taxes" of citizens, this institution really "exploits people", means it represents an "exploiting institution". Of course, some readers, especially if they come from the circle of "atheistic orthodox scientists", are going to argue here, that there exist also scientists who are funded by industry or by various private institutions, e.g. by the private universities. To those, however, persons, I would advise to consider "where come from" and "what consequences cause" such principles of financing of these supposedly "non-tax" sources of livelihoods for some scientists. As it turns out, these sources always have the character of a "tax which is only called with a different name". For example, the funding of some scientists by the industry causes that products of this industry must be sold on the market at more expensive prices than necessary. Thus, the buyers of these products actually pay kinds of hidden "taxes" which are directed to upkeep of these scientists. The same is true of other "non-tax" scientists, such as those employed in private universities - they also raise the cost, but this time of education, and therefore they also impose onto people an additional kind of "taxes", only that officially these are NOT called "taxes".
...(here several items were removed to fit this post into limits of memory allocation) ...
6. This definition does NOT reveal, that for other approaches to research, such as the approach called "a priori" (means "from the cause to effects", or "from God understood as the superior cause of everything, to the reality around us which represents an effect of the action of this God"), almost all the phenomena explained by the official science in a way known to us today, receive a completely different explanations - the correctness of which is also confirmed by the existing evidence. This in turn causes, that for the humanity is revealed by the official science only considerably less than half of the "truth" about the universe around us - as this is explained more comprehensively e.g. in item #C2 from web page named "tornado.htm". Meanwhile, the opposite philosophical approach to that used by the science to-date, called "a priori" approach (means "from cause to effects" or "from God understood as a superior cause of everything, to the surrounding reality understood as effects of the activities of this God"), i.e. the approach used in practice by the new "totaliztic science", explains every phenomenon and every object in a completely different way than it is done by the official science. To learn some more drastic examples of differences in these explanations, it is enough to learn explanations of the new "totaliztic science" for the process of creation of the physical world - described in subsections A1 to A9 from volume 1 of my newest monograph [1/5], or an explanation of the mechanism of the tornadoes’ formation - described in the totaliztic web page named "tornado.htm". Best of all, these new persecuted explanations of the new "totaliztic science", are equally well confirmed by the existing evidence, as the official explanations disseminated by the old official science. As it was discovered only by the new "totaliztic science", in the world created and governed intelligently by omnipotent God (i.e. in such a world that is described by items #B1 to #B3 from the web page named "changelings.htm"), the origins of every event and every object is confirmed by at least three (3) mutually different (and seemingly contradictory) groups of evidence - this fact is explained in more details in abovementioned item #C2 from the web page named "tornado.htm".
7. This definition does NOT reveal that in order to maintain its atheism and achieve its selfish goals, the "science" to-date in the intended manner eliminates from its research the exploration of the impact that any events on the Earth have onto the level of so-called "group morality" of people affected by these events. On the other hand, in the "world created and governed intelligently by omnipotent God" (i.e. in the world defined in items #B1 to #B3 from the web page named "changelings.htm") the "morality" turns out to be the primordial cause of all disasters that affect both individual people and whole communities. At the same time, "morality" is the only factor known to people which can be subject to change and arbitrarily shaped by the people themselves, and thus which allows for communities and individuals to effectively defend themselves against disasters that affect them - i.e. defend from sorts of "natural cataclysms" described e.g. in items #I3 and #I5 from the web page named "petone.htm" or from "premature deaths" described e.g. in items #G1 to #G8 of the web page named "will.htm". (For the totaliztic definition of "morality" see item #B5 from the web page named "morals.htm".)
8. Some definitions of the term "science" (in this number also the definition quoted as an example at the beginning of this post) tell us that the "science" supposedly can also be a kind of "abstract" whose existence in the physical world is NOT dependent on the physical existence of an institution that generate products of a given "science". This their claim is similar to claims that supposedly the "religions" can exist without the existence of a "religious institutions" that have implemented and carried out a given kind of faith and the accompanying rituals. However, any rationally thinking person who knows how many drastically different religions and cults human imperfections already managed to multiply only in a small group of Christian religions, after the analysing of this matter must begin to understand, that neither the "science" nor "religion", or in fact any other "abstract", is able to consistently exist if the existence of it is NOT supported and NOT implemented by a physical institution.
Of course, apart from these listed above, there are also further problems and imperfections built into the current official definition of the term "science". But those other ones are no longer quite as important as those indicated above. An example of these other ones is the fact that virtually all the official definitions of the term "science" disseminated around the world by the old "atheistic orthodox science" actually "disagree" with what ordinary people understand by the name "science".
With all this in mind, the new "totaliztic science" advocates that the term "science" should be redefined ("reformed") urgently. Of course, as is always the case with the definitions, such a new "totaliztic" definition of the term "science" can be expressed in a number of different wordings, all of which can still turn our attention to the urgent need of elimination of the shortcomings of "science" - as indicated above. One such possible totalizticaly "reformed" definition of "science", could for example be expressed with the following wording:
The reformed by totalizm definition number #1 of the term "science", developed on the basis of past experience of mankind collected along the road on which this "science" pushes itself and the entire mankind:
"Science" is an exploiting institution which lives from taxes of citizens, whose actual purpose is to meet its own needs by forcing onto the people, and later jealous guarding, of its absolute "monopoly" for the knowledge and for shaping human views, and which as a tool to achieve its selfish goal uses, amongst others: (1) its own (not subjected to independent and external verification, and thus inherently false) claim that it supposedly learned and disseminates the "truth" about the universe around us; (2) only the accepted by itself philosophical foundations and doctrines about which it has already found-out that they best serve towards its selfish goals (instead of serving for the whole of humanity) – such as "atheism", "Occam's razor", the elimination from research the impact that "morality" has on the course of events in our world, etc.; (3) the approach to research of its own choice, that confirms in the easiest way the supposed correctness of its claims - e.g. the approach called "a posteriori" (instead of any different approach, e.g. "a priori"); (4) the developed by itself traditions, culture, methods of operation, etc., which turn to be most favourable to its own interests - such as "peer reviews" (by its own representatives) of all academic publications, the forcing of promoters to supervise work of young academics, the elimination of the research-topics that would lead to the discovery of truths that turn out to be dangerous to its interests (for example, the truth about the existence of God, the truth about simulation of UFOs by God, the truth about the possibility of "fabrication" by God of geological layers and e.g. "bones of dinosaurs", that accelerate the activeness of the humanity in the "pursue of knowledge" - as described in the example from item #H2 of the web page named "god_exists.htm", etc.), the disclosure of only that portion of the reality that surrounds us, which seems to confirm its own claims, ignoring or purposely overlooking these facts and theories already being developed (e.g. the so-called "Concept of Dipolar Gravity") that turn out to be contradictory to its claims; etc.; etc.
In the above definition have either been named directly (and thus indicated for elimination) these imperfections of the "official definition" of science which were previously listed, or these imperfections are to be revealed indirectly - as a consequence of work of this definition.
Primitivism and the inadequacy of the current "official" definition of the term "science" is the direct cause and the reason for a multitude of disasters that recently plague the mankind. After all, by lying to the mankind, the science actually directs people astray and into an abyss. To indicate here the mechanism by which the incorrect definition of the term "science" causes the currently occurring downfall of the mankind, it suffices to explain that this official and monopolistic "science" disseminates amongst the people cardinally wrong the so-called "scientific morality" described, among others, in items #B2 and #B6 from the web page named "morals.htm". In turn for practicing this wrong "scientific morality" God severely punishes today's communities with cataclysms - as it is explained e.g. in item #I5 or item #I3 from the web page named "petone.htm".
Developing a reformed definition (No. #1) for the term "science" – i.e. the one cited above, opens now the possibility to formulate a range of specific definitions for various "sciences". The first of these definitions, a reformed version of which is needed the most urgently at present, is the definition of official human science to-date, which for the valid reasons a lot of people calls already the "old atheistic orthodox science" (after all, this science is actually "old" - because it lived for thousands of years, it is also the "atheistic" and "orthodox"). Here is the reformed by the new "totaliztic science" definition of that old science:
Totaliztic definition No. #2 for the old official "atheistic orthodox science" (i.e. the old scientific institution, which still dictates what we should learn in schools and at universities, and which retains an absolute "monopoly" for shaping our views):
The old "atheistic orthodox science" is an exploiting institution living from taxes of citizens, the actual goal of which is to meet its own needs due to the success it has achieved in forcing onto the people and then jealously guarding of its absolute "monopoly" for the knowledge and for shaping the views of people, which as tools for achieving its selfish goals uses, amongst others: (1) its own (not subjected to independent and external verification) claim that it supposedly learned and disseminates the "truth" about the universe around us; (2) only accepted by itself the philosophical foundations and doctrines which have already convinced it that they best serve towards its selfish goals (instead of serving for the good of whole humanity) - i.e. such as "atheism", "Occam's razor", elimination of the research on impact of morality onto the course of events in our world, etc.; (3) the selected by itself approach to research, which in an easiest way confirms the correctness of the claims it makes - i.e. "a posteriori" approach (instead of any other approach, e.g. "a priori"); (4) the developed by itself traditions, culture, methods of operation, etc., which turn out to be the best for its own interests - of the kind of "peer reviews" of all academic papers by its representatives, the forcing of promoters to young academics, the elimination of the research-topics that would lead to the discovery of truths that turn out to be dangerous to its own interests (e.g. truths such as about the existence of God, about simulation of UFOs by God, about the possibility of "fabrication" by God of geological layers and e.g. "bones of dinosaurs", which accelerate the activeness of the humanity in the "pursue of knowledge" - as described e.g. in item #H2 from the web page named "god_exists.htm", etc.), the disclose of only that portion of the reality surrounding people, which seems to confirm its claims, the ignoring of facts and theories already being developed (e.g. the so-called "Concept of Dipolar Gravity") that appear to be contradictory to its statements; etc., etc.
An absolute "monopoly for knowledge and for the shaping of human views" that holds and jealously guards this old "atheistic orthodox science", is the original source of practically almost all the evil and suffering that we see on Earth today. Therefore, the overthrow of that monopoly is becoming nowadays one of the most urgent tasks for the entire mankind. However, in order that monopoly could be overthrown, we must first define exactly the new "totaliztic science" which has all the features that are necessary to successfully refute the monopoly of that old science.
Both reformed definitions of "science", i.e. the definition number #1 for the term "science" (provided above) and also the definition number #2 for the term "old atheistic orthodox science" (provided above as well), allow us now to define precisely what is meant by the term "new totaliztic science". Here is the definition of the new "totaliztic science" developed by this new science itself. (Notice, however, that this definition describes the new "totaliztic science" in its present state and situation. So if one day actually the new "totaliztic science" will be officially transformed into an institution which also lives from taxes of citizens, then this definition will require updating.)
The totaliztic definition number #3 for the new (and still eventuating) "totaliztic science", self-developed by this new science:
The name "new totaliztic science" has been assigned to a set of science-creating tools, means to a set of ideas, scientific and philosophical foundations, objectives, principles, methods of conduct, etc. (such as "theory of everything" called the "Concept of Dipolar Gravity", the philosophy called "totalizm", the philosophical approach to research called "a priori" - means "from cause to effects" or "from God understood as a superior cause of everything to the surrounding reality which represents the effects of the actions of this God", the formal proof for the existence of God, the rules of conduct which require that to the description of each fact and object is included an answer to questions of the type "how", "why", "what is the evidence which confirms this", and still several further ones), which science-creating tools are almost exactly opposite to those practiced by the old "atheistic orthodox science", and thus which (if they are implemented in the officially established scientific institution) will supply the moral strength, philosophical foundations, scientific and theoretical basis, and motivations, to overthrow the existing "monopoly for knowledge and for the shaping of human views" held so-far by that old "atheistic orthodox science", and thus will unleash natural mechanisms of "competition" that facilitate fast human progress along the path of truth.
At this point it should also be emphasized that the reason and goal for which humanity should urgently establish and fund officially a new "totaliztic science", is the overthrow of the monopoly of the old science and the replacement of this monopoly with the dynamic state of equilibrium and mutual interaction between these two sciences (or mere strictly - the reciprocal "looking the competition at its hands" and the validation of whatever this competition is trying to "feed" to the humanity). In turn only the existence of such a dynamic equilibrium and mutual competition is to eliminate the corruption, errors, distortions, lies, etc., with which will overgrow every science that works on principles of "monopoly". Therefore, in the vital interest of the truth (and thus also the entire humanity) is that the new "totaliztic science" was established "in addition" to the old science, and also that through the establishment of the new "totaliztic science", or as a result of the current struggle for the establishment of it, this old "atheistic orthodox science" was NOT accidentally destroyed (as that old science already destroyed the institutions of "religions"). This is because after such a destruction, the new science soon would become a "monopolistic institution" and would start again overgrowing with various destructive defects which are characteristic to all "monopolies".
Of course, regardless of the performing towards the old "atheistic orthodox science" the function of "competition" - so immensely needed by the humanity, such an official establishing of the new "totaliztic science" would perform also a number of additional functions, the potential and opportunities of which in the present times we are not even able to imagine. For example, it would complement the knowledge of our civilization by that missing "second half" of knowledge, the existence of which the to-date research of our reality from "a posteriori" approach simply is unable to notice. In these people who are ready to accept God, this new science would allow to replace the "belief in God" with the "knowledge of God". After all, it is known that religions at most are able to offer to people the "belief in God". But the new "science" is able to offer the reliable knowledge, confidence, verifiable evidence, explanations of "why", "how", "since", etc. Moreover, it is also known that one can always stop "believing", however, one NEVER ceases to "know". It is also worth noting that the success of a situation of "competition" in the taming of errors, distortions, corruption, etc., in the institution of science, would inspire the humanity to seek similar solutions based on "competition" in a number of other areas susceptible to corruption, distortions, errors, etc. - for example, in the area of governance of country, in local governments, in the administration of businesses, in the institution of marriage, etc. (for details see e.g. the entire web page named "humanity.htm" and item #J2.2.2 on the web page named "morals.htm"). Furthermore, when the new "totaliztic science" is officially established, it will make sure that it builds and puts into service for the humanity, NOT only my Magnocraft and my Oscillatory Chamber, but also my Time Vehicle – thus opening for people almost unlimited prospects. (After all, as this is clearly visible from the to-date course of events, the corruption and faults of the old "atheistic orthodox science" cause, that this old science will never be able to undertake the completion of my devices.)
It is also worth adding here, that in spite of its existence for over 37 years, i.e. since 1985 - when the ground-breaking for eventuation of the "totaliztic science" theory of everything called the "Concept of Dipolar Gravity" was created, until August 2012 - when the author this post formulated and published this post (item), and maybe even until today, the whole new "totaliztic science" still consisted of only one scientist who privately and at his own expense carried out all research completed by this science, i.e. consisted (and possibly may consist until now) only the author of this post - whose autobiography the reader is able to find in the web page named "pajak_jan_uk.htm". The necessity to sustain the existence and operation of the whole new "totaliztic science" through the effort and skills of only one scientist for so long, reveals how widespread and deep is the terror sown in the society by the vengeful institution of old "atheistic orthodox science", and how much other scientists are afraid to speak on the side of truth and morality for the fear of harassments, bullying, removals from work, accusations of mental illnesses, etc., that await everyone who for the good of all people dare to do today what is actually required from him by his conscience, knowledge, and the sense of responsibility.
* * *
The above post, which re-defines (reforms) the term "science" on basis of the to-date (painful) experiences of the humanity about behaviours of this monopolistic and exploiting institution, is an adaptation of items #C2 to #C4 from the totaliztic web page named "telekinetics.htm" (in the English language) - updated on 25 August 2012, or later. Thus, reading of the above descriptions would be even more effective from that web page, than from this post - after all e.g. on the totaliztic web pages are working all (green) links to other related web pages with additional explanations, texts are printed in colours, the content is supported with illustrations, the content is updated regularly, etc. The most recent update of the web page "telekinetics.htm" can be viewed, amongst others, at addresses:
http://soul.frihost.org/telekinetics.htm or alias: http://naj.zs.pl - which always links to the most recently updated amongst totaliztic web pages)
Notice that every address with totaliztic web pages, including the above web sites, should contain all totaliztic web pages - including web pages indicated in this post. Thus, in order to see any totaliztic web page that interests us, it suffices that in one amongst the above addresses the web page name "telekinetics.htm" is changed into the name of page which the reader wishes to see. For example, in order to see the web page named "tornado.htm" e.g. from the totaliztic web site with the address http://energia.sl.pl/telekinetics.htm , it is enough that instead of this address in the window of an internet explorer the reader writes e.g. the address http://energia.sl.pl/tornado.htm .
Also notice that a complete list of (and links to) totaliztic topics discussed in various internet forums is provided in item #E2 of the web page named "faq.htm" - also available at every address listed above.
It is worth to know as well, that almost each new topic that I am researching with "a priori" approach of the new "totaliztic science", including this one, is repeated in all mirror blogs of totalizm still in existence (the above topic is repeated in there as the post number #223E). In past there were 5 such blogs. At the moment only two other blogs of totalizm still remain undeleted by adversaries of the new "totaliztic science" and the moral philosophy of totalizm. These can be viewed at following internet addresses:
http://totalizm.wordpress.com (or alias: http://blog.zs.pl )
With the totaliztic salute,