Blog > Komentarze do wpisu
#205E: The lying of the science that baobabs are pollinated by fruit bats (in English - po polsku ponizej)

Motto: "Your fences eat your rice" (i.e. a proverb from Malaysia which reminds us the old truth that those ones who are paid for implementing something, typically with the elapse of time become the biggest enemies of this something, e.g. "monopolistic science becomes the biggest enemy of progress and truths", "complacent politicians become biggest obstacles in solving problems of a given country", "greedy bankers become most important cause of every economic crisis", "powerful priests become the biggest enemies of truth and knowledge about God", etc., etc. - NOT without important reasons God emphasized this truth to us by causing that Jesus was send to death by high priests).

The matter of pollination and procreation of flowers and trees, is NOT only elementary, but also it is researched by entire crowds of present expensive scientists. So we are believing that in this matter there are NO puzzles left, while scientists so heavily subsidised from our taxes know already practically everything on this subject. Thus no-one is surprised by nonchalant statements of scientists, that commonly known African trees called "baobabs", are pollinated at nights NOT by wind or insects, but by "fruit bats". After all, in spite that "bats" are rather unusual kinds of "pollinators", this information with the high certainty is published by present scientists literally in hundreds of works and sources - e.g. the reader can find it in almost every web page devoted to baobabs. However, the truth is such, that this claim is just a "huge pile of bullshit". In reality baobabs are NOT pollinated as scientists claim it, nor procreate in the way as science describes this to us. In fact, the official human science (i.e. the science which by some is called the "atheistic orthodox science") still does NOT have any clue how baobabs really are pollinated and how they really procreate. (More information about this old "atheistic orthodox science", which still desperately clings to its absolute "monopole for knowledge" - although uses just a single, highly limited, and erroneous approach to research by philosophers called "a posteriori", the reader can learn from item #A2.6 of the web page "totalizm.htm", item #C1 of the web page named "telekinetics.htm", item #J2 of the web page named "pajak_jan_uk.htm", and items #F1.1 to #F3 of the web page named "god_exists.htm". Reading that information the reader will learn a bitter truth explained more comprehensively in item #C1 of the web page "cooking.htm", namely that "all problems of our civilisation are secondary consequences of the fatal 'monopole for knowledge' so possessively held by the 'atheistic orthodox science' to date".) There is even an illustrative proof which everyone can check, and which documents that "fruit bats do NOT pollinate baobabs". For the use of readers, I am going to describe now this proof.

On the Malaysian island of Penang lives a lonely, large, single (female) baobab, over 140 years old - see a photograph of it shown as "Fig. #C1ab" from the web page named "cooking.htm". One can find this baobab in the middle of a rondo especially build over there to protect it on the junction of three streets named "Jalan Macalister", "Jalan Residensi" and "Jalan Pangkor". About this baobab from the Malaysian island of Penang a lot of legends and funny stories is told, e.g. that it was brought to Penang and planted in there by a strange traveller with capabilities of the famous "magician" named David Copperfield, or that when it rapidly releases the excess of water accumulated in its tissues then local people believe a miracle happens and pray to it (supposedly then their prayers are even answered). But the most mysterious attribute of that lonely baobab from the Malaysian island of Penang is, that in spite of blooming generously, it never produces fruits from which its descendants could grow. In the result, until today it has NOT produced a descendant in Malaysia. This its inability to multiply is also a document for the ignorance of present scientists. Namely, present "atheistic orthodox scientists" complacent in their armchairs (as they are described in items #F1 to #F3 from a separate web page named "god_exists.htm", and also reminded in item #D3 of the web page named "cooking.htm"), nonchalantly express unverified opinion, that in order to pollinate baobabs, suffices that fruit bats feed at night on their flowers. However, on the island of Penang live tropical fruit bats and for sure many of them feed on flowers of the discussed baobab. But still this baobab remains not pollinated and still it does NOT produce fruits capable of generating new trees. In other words, similarly as this is the case with humans, in order to produce descendants, probably are necessary at least two unrelated baobab trees - which mutually for each other perform functions of a husband and wife (i.e. perform male and female functions). So in this matter, baobabs clearly are similar to trees of Malaysian "durian" fruit (i.e. the fruit described in item #G1 of the web page named "fruit.htm") - which also can multiply and produce fruits only if close to each other grow at least two mutually unrelated durian trees. So when a next time we read ignorant claims of present "atheistic orthodox scientists" on the subject of pollination of baobabs by tropical fruit bats, it is worth to have in memory this lonely female baobab tree from Penang, which produces flowers and which is visited by fruit bats, but because there is no male tree around to fertilise these flowers, thus, unfortunately, even after over 140 years of flowering it still failed to produce fruits - thus until today it remains in Malaysia without having its own descendants.

This Malaysian lonely baobab from the island of Penang is NOT the only case when the atheistic orthodox science "tells nonsense" to naive people, thus causing cataclysmic changes on the Earth the repairs of which are going to occupy the humanity for hundreds, if not for thousands, of years. Examples of next lies and nonsense also spread amongst people by the official science deprived of any "competition" thus having no-one who would "look it at hands" and make sure it tells the truth, as well as deprived of any moral breaks, include, amongst others:

1. Lies regarding God ?i.e. that supposedly there are NO scientific proofs that God really exists. These are obvious lies of the official science, as that there is a large body of scientific proofs and evidence which all unambiguously confirm that God really exists. Some amongst these proofs and evidence are described on the totaliztic web page named "god_proof.htm".

2. "Holding heads in sand" in matters of UFOs. The official atheistic science refuses to research UFOs and pretends that there are NO objective evidence and proofs for the existence of UFOs - as this is explained more comprehensively in item #B1 from the web page named "ufo_proof.htm". On the other hand, there is a wealth of such evidence and proofs. The only problem with UFOs depends on the fact that UFOnauts do NOT want to cooperate with human scientists, while our scientists are too ignorant and too arrogant to be able to research something that intelligently refuses to cooperate with them. In the result, scientists are too afraid that their ignorance "comes to surface" during the research on UFOs, so they avoid the subject of UFOs like "devils avoid holy water".

3. Ignorance of scientists in matters of phenomena that lie beyond the textbook knowledge and beyond the to-date understanding of the world around them, e.g. phenomena such as telekinesis, telekinetics, telepathy, etc. This ignorance result from the stubborn ignoring and rejecting my "theory of everything" called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity which explains these phenomena unknown to the official science, and which simultaneously proves the existence of God.

4. Complete blindness of science and its stand regarding "fabrications" such as "bones of dinosaurs" as well as regarding conventional dating of geological structures. Much wider explanation what this error and blindness of science regarding the "bones of dinosaurs" is all about, is offered, amongst others, in item #H2 of the web page named "god_istnieje.htm".

5. The spread of "scientific nonsense", like for example the "theory of the Big Bang" which implies that "the entire universe supposedly originates from nothing". The wider discussion of the error of this scientific claim that "the entire universe originates from nothing" is provided in (5) from item #C12 of the web page named "bible.htm".

6. The lack of knowledge and ignorance of the official science in even most elementary matters, for example "what is gravity", "how the universe eventuated", "what is the goal of our existence", "what 'morality' really is", etc., etc. On the other hand, the new "totaliztic science" already provided us with explanations and answers to these matters - only that dissemination of these explanations and answers is jealously blocked by the "atheistic orthodox science" which greedily guards its "monopole on knowledge". For example, to learn "what is gravity" see the web page named "dipolar_gravity.htm", for learning "how the universe eventuated" see subsections A1 to A6 from volume 1 of my newest monograph [1/5] (summarised briefly in item #E1 of the web page named "will.htm"), for learning "what is the goal of our existence" see item #B4 of the web page "tornado.htm", for learning "what 'morality' really is" see item #B5 from the web page named "morals.htm", etc., etc.

7. Biased approach, ignorance, arrogance, and a complete lack of progress in solving by the official science the most burning issues of our present civilisation. On the other hand this new "totaliztic science", in spite of its acting without any finances while being almost continually persecuted by the official science, already by now managed to find and to indicate to people solutions for the majority of these problems - for examples of these solutions see: item #B5 of the web page named "seismograph.htm" (for earthquakes), item #I3 from the web page "day26.htm" (for tsunamis), the web page "tornado.htm" (for tornadoes), the web page "telekinetics.htm" (for new sources of energy), the web page "eco_cars.htm" (for air pollution), etc., etc.

8. The reinforcement by scientists of the culture of unpunished lying and misleading of people. If an engineer builds a bridge or a house which collapses and kills anyone, then usually he lands in a prison. If a medical doctor kills anyone with his medicines or erroneous diagnosis, then at least he is struck out of register. But if a scientist spreads lies under an excuse of scientific research, then he does NOT bear any consequences. In fact, probably no-one ever heard of a scientist who would bear responsibility for lying or for misleading people. On the other hand such a situation gives a bad example to other people, because it spreads and reinforces the culture of unpunished lying and misleading. It would be with a benefit to the morality and to truth when also scientists were taking responsibility for the moral consequences and for the truth of whatever they state publicly. The problem of an immense importance of spreading the truth, even this most unpopular and persecuted (after all, "without learning the truth there is NO progress"), and the problem of responsibility of scientists for the spread of truth, is discussed on a number of totaliztic web pages. For examples of these - see item #F1 from the web page named "totalizm.htm", item #K1 from the web page named "morals.htm", or item #E1 from the web page named "will.htm".

* * *

This above post, together with two photographs of the lonely baobab from the island of Penang, originally is published in item #C2 of the totaliztic web page named "cooking.htm" (update of 1st September 2011, or later). Thus, reading the above descriptions would be even more effective from that web page "cooking.htm" than from this post, as on the web page are working all (green) links to other related web pages with additional explanations, it is printed in colour, it is supported with illustrations, the content of it is updated regularly, etc. The latest update of the web page "cooking.htm" can be viewed, amongst others, at addresses:  or alias: (which always links to the most important amongst current updates)

It is also worth to know, that almost each new topic that I am researching with "a priori" approach of the new "totaliztic science", including this one, is repeated in all mirror blogs of totalizm still in existence (the above topic is repeated in there as the post number #205E). In past there were 5 such blogs. At the moment only two blogs of totalizm still remain undeleted by adversaries of the new "totaliztic science" and the moral philosophy of totalizm. These can be viewed at following internet addresses: or alias:
It is also worth to have look in there at related posts, e.g. at posts number #204E to #200E, #195E, #171E and #151E - which also discuss the incompetence and errors of the old official science in solving the most burning problems of our present civilisation.

With the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak

piątek, 02 września 2011, totalizm

Polecane wpisy

TrackBack URL wpisu: